Can someone give me an honest answer? Do your DVDS and Blu-rays stink compared to original footage?
Can someone who videotapes dance recitals and choir concerts please respond?
(I'm sure that well lit and close-up shot videos look great on discs, but I'm talking about concerts, musicals, etc.)
We use Panasonic AG-AC130 shot in 1920 x 1080i to videotape.
This raw footage looks great.
We edit using Vegas Pro 13. Our project settings match the raw footage.
DVDS - We use the "DVD Architect NTSC Widescreen video stream" template to render.
Upper field first.
Render quality best, bit rate 8,000,000.
We author in DVD architect 6.
Blu-ray - We use the "Blu-ray 1920x1080-60i 16 Mbps video stream" template set to 20,000,000 bit rate
We use DVD Architect to author.
I'm pretty certain we use the correct templates.
DVDS look OK if you stand 12 feet away from a 42" " monitor. Any closer, they are crappy!
Blu-rays are a little better, but I would expect great results going from HD footage to Blu-ray. Am I wrong?
The Blu-ray crappiness really frustrates me.
The sad/good thing is...our clients keep on coming back. They seem oblivious to the crapiness we give them.
I dread testing DVDS and Blu-rays because I can't stand to look at them.
(I am not one of the "over-picky, anal people either. These things stink compared to native footage)
Looking for perspective and maybe help. Thank you to anyone who responds.