Render speed: VEGAS PRO 17 VS Premiere Pro CC 2019
lan-mLMC
wrote on 11/24/2019, 11:23 PM
Comments
3POINT
wrote on 11/24/2019, 11:44 PM
What are you trying to show us. Vegas Pro rendering speed without GPU support vs Premier Pro with GPU support? Why not Vegas Pro with GPU support vs Premier Pro with GPU support?
lan-mLMC
wrote on 11/25/2019, 12:00 AM
What are you trying to show us. Vegas Pro rendering speed without GPU support vs Premier Pro with GPU support? Why not Vegas Pro with GPU support vs Premier Pro with GPU support?
Softwarre encoding
fr0sty
wrote on 11/25/2019, 12:03 AM
It wasn't shown that Premiere/AME was running solely on the CPU.
lan-mLMC
wrote on 11/25/2019, 12:04 AM
It wasn't shown that Premiere/AME was running solely on the CPU.
grey string: Softwarre encoding
fred-w
wrote on 11/25/2019, 12:40 AM
The ONE thing I am consistently satisfied with, vis-a-vis the later versions of Vegas Pro, is the ever improving render times.
fifonik
wrote on 11/25/2019, 12:50 AM
Yes, I saw "software encoding".
Howerer, still did not understand your point.
Different encoders. Different settings. Very strange VBR settings (max = average). Unknown result's quality (I'm not saying that Premier's quality is worse. I do not know as it was not shown).
=> ???
P.S. I can render x264 Very Fast vs x264 Slowest both VBR 12Mbps. The second one would be slower, you know (but with better quality). Or I can render Magix AVC vs Sony AVC with the same 3Mbps bitrate. Speed would be different, quality would be poor (but in different ways). And?
Musicvid
wrote on 11/25/2019, 9:48 AM
It would be easier if you would just post the MediaInfo for each file, and note the render times.
fr0sty
wrote on 11/25/2019, 11:00 AM
That is one thing I do hope to see in Vegas 18, a "Vegas Encode" app that works like AME, a batch encoder that can render out any format Vegas can and seamlessly integrates with both Effects and Pro. This would probably work wonders with stability, many of Vegas' current bugs seem to be related to rendering.