I haven't show her yet the content I've made with Vegas to her, because of Vegas I gain 17K subscribers on YouTube. Plus I make tutorial on how to make certain FX in Vegas. I need to gather more data to proof her wrong

Data is not necessary, results will work. Yes there have been features and documentaries created using Vegas but the teacher is already biased so only showing great quality results will work.

-- "Tis a poor workman who blames his tools.

Teachers, like anyone else, tout the tools they are comfortable with, and tend to discredit the rest.

She said that if you're working with a someone who works on pr, then u have no choice to use it too. But if not mistaken vegas can export the project into Pr/AE project file..but it makes more sense unless ur doing 3D stuff in AE and back to Vegas for editing and so on

Terry Abraham uses Vegas Pro. His beautiful films get shown on prime time BBC (Link. Link). YouTube. Facebook.

The idea that Adobe is the center of the universe is a particularly pernicious marketing problem. What about AVID? (THE mainstay of Hollywood.) There is actually a huge variety of editing software choice, so the idea that everyone must use the same is patently false.

There are some links posted on the Vegas facebook page. Plus dig around here e.g. (Mauritania railway short). I will look when I have some time.

She said that if you're working with a someone who works on pr, then u have no choice to use it too.

That cuts both ways. If someone wants to work with me, they better be Vegas compatible. I have never cared for any Adobe product, as they are deliberately incompatible with any industry standard. For example, as far as I know, none of their products work with the OFX industry standard.

About the only good thing that ever came out of Adobe was Postscript, but even then they kept the Type 1 font spec a secret until the rest of the industry created TrueType. Then suddenly they released the Type 1 spec, just to keep themselves from being thrown out to the bin of history.

No offense to your lecturer, but she sounds a bit arrogant and ill-informed. Just for fun, you should ask her what the most profitable movie in history was. If she is like most people, she will probably say Avatar. Then you can clarify, "I mean return on investment profit. Not gross profit." To that, my guess is she won't know. At that point, you can tell her it was Paranormal Activity. And then add that it was edited in Vegas Pro.

Anything that can be done in Premiere or FCP can be done in Vegas. For her to say that you are a bad editor is absurd and honestly, going forward, I would take what she says with a grain of salt.

I can edit the same film or project in all three, and she would not be able to tell the difference. With Resolve now being a fully-functional NLE, does she think that's a fool's tool too?

To be fair, Vegas did have some catching up to do and was neglected by Sony while they pursued their Catalyst Suite. But now Magix has made great strides and is back in the game albeit I don't think Vegas ever really left. Certainly, the world of video editing is more than a two-horse town. You'd think she'd know that as a lecturer.

Paranormal activity...that's the one I was trying to remember. :)

Here's an older listing:

https://www.vegascreativesoftware.info/us/forum/what-films-videos-edited-with-vegas--90634/

I haven't show her yet the content I've made with Vegas to her, because of Vegas I gain 17K subscribers on YouTube.

Actuallyu with that statement you are almost as guilty as your lecturer. You have gained 17K subscribers because of your content and skills. It has nothing to do with the fact you used Vegas :)

A few things to point out to your lecturer...

1. Vegas offers scripting support to enhance her program's performance as much as some paid plugins offer for free.

2. Mention that Vegas has far superior audio tools vs. Premiere, and functions as a complete DAW on its own.

3. Last time I checked, there were no options to preview 10 bit or higher video full screen in Premiere.

4. Premiere's HDR is fake (last time I checked, they forced colors to Rec709 color space, no BT2020.

5. You could always challenge her to a face off cutting video... I'm willing to bet you get yours done faster...

6. Final Cut is a great app that you have to overpay just to use (just buying the mac in the first place is overpaying), it isn't compatible with as many formats, so it will force "ingesting" certain formats into ProRes. While editing in intermediates is recommended in most cases, it is nice to have the compatibility with the raw formats straight from the camera if I only need to use a few angles max and don't want to spend the time making proxies and intermediates. Apple does do a fantastic job of keeping it on the bleeding edge with new features coming frequently, but the only reason it gets used as widely as it does is because it is on mac, and many people who are intimidated by PCs go to mac.

7. Vegas supports OpenGL video output at 10 bit full screen, and even more compatibility with even more display hardware is in the works.

8. Perpetual licenses... This alone should be the deal breaker. Not all of us like a monthly drain on our bank accounts, thought Vegas still offers Vegas 365 for those of us who might want to try it on a project without committing.

9. With Premiere, what you see isn't always what you get. I've had beautiful video come out of AME washed out and flat. Encode speeds are not much if any faster than Vegas. In some cases it seems slower.

Also, I've talked to Magix about the exporting issues when exporting projects to other apps, and they have stated they are focusing a lot of attention on trying to improve that aspect of Vegas Pro, so expect that to be addressed in future updates/versions.

our lecturer and she's said I'm a bad editor if I'm using different editing software besides Premiere Pro and Final cut....she said that most of media out there using Premiere and Final for professional use's, not Sony Vegas and etc. (Yes she said Sony Vegas.

That, would have me putting her in her place right there and then...... Without any apology, that lecturer is misinformed, arrogant and out of touch on so many levels.