[Release] VEGAS Pro 17 โ€“ The fastest NLE. For passionate creatives.

Comments

Komaryt wrote on 8/5/2019, 6:18 AM

"Anyone can explain me what differences are between Vegas 17 Edit and Vegas 17 Pro?"

Vegas Pro comes with a DVD Architect license, Vegas Pro Edit don't.

and that's it ?! wow so after I test trial version I think that edit is good for me because I have Architect with V15.
I can't wait for test that! And if new color grading will as good as davinci's then I will uninstall davinci and there won't be problems with XML exporting from Vegas ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜™

Marco. wrote on 8/5/2019, 6:22 AM

"and that's it?!"

See here.

fr0sty wrote on 8/5/2019, 6:43 AM

@JN You could use it for that. It lets you set a slider that starts at 1.0x, so after processing, as long as your project setttings were of a higher frame rate, theoretically it should work as long as you leave playback speed at full.

*I have not tested this.

mateuszszar wrote on 8/5/2019, 6:43 AM

the problem with the sound card (Native Instrument - Komplete Audio 6)ย still exists.

I always get information after the renderer:

"The ASIO device Komplete Audio 6 caused an internal exception (0xe06d7363) and has been disabled.
The ASIO device Komplete Audio 6 caused an internal exception (0xe06d7363) and has been disabled."

joost-berk wrote on 8/5/2019, 7:07 AM

Congrats to the Magix / Vegas team for delivering a package that is fully packed with features. I think it is the best NLE out there. I am a proud user since version 1.2 and will continue this in the future! I convinced so many people in my surrounding to use Vegas Pro in the past years. People who now work faster with less hassle. Keep doing this great work, actualy Magix is the best thing that happend to Vegas in a long time! I am verry happy with this software and community!

Vegas Pro user since version 1.2

OS: Windows 10 Pro 1809

CPU: Intel Core i7-7820X

RAM: 32GB

GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB GDDR

Monitoring: Black Magic Design DeckLink SDI 4K

Audio: M-Audio M-Track Eight ASIO

Controller: Behringer X-Touch

Komaryt wrote on 8/5/2019, 8:04 AM

"and that's it?!"

See here.

yeah I already found that too and this is the main difference between this two because I am not using this plugins which I can use with Pro version.
I see that we need to wait for some update to Vegas 17 :D but this color grading feature is cool! Easy to use hard to master :D

Marty74 wrote on 8/5/2019, 8:27 AM

I have not seen the VEGAS POST. Will it be released today?

We are performing the final testing on VEGAS POST and the release will follow within the coming days.

thank you for the information ! pretty sure you're not allowed (lol) to answer this, but as someone possibly interested by Vegas effects, is it the right moment to upgrade to Vegas Pro 17 or better is to wait the release of Post to see the crossgrade price or any possibility of that kind (i'm only interested by the video Effects additionnal software).

MagixPascal wrote on 8/5/2019, 8:34 AM

"Anyone can explain me what differences are between Vegas 17 Edit and Vegas 17 Pro?"

Vegas Pro comes with a DVD Architect license, Vegas Pro Edit don't.

and that's it ?! wow so after I test trial version I think that edit is good for me because I have Architect with V15.
I can't wait for test that! And if new color grading will as good as davinci's then I will uninstall davinci and there won't be problems with XML exporting from Vegas ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜™

You could export it as LUT. Enjoy VP17!

MagixPascal wrote on 8/5/2019, 8:40 AM

Marco, would it be possible that the new โ€œoptical flowโ€ feature could also improve rendering out old 15fps footage to say 25fps, or is it purely for slomo?

At the moment it is a static respeeding tool (like Twixtor)... but your dynamic solution is on our internal wishlist.

JN_ wrote on 8/5/2019, 8:49 AM

@MagixPascal Nice to know.

ย 

Desktop and Laptop basic specs ...

Both run Win 10 ...

Running latest ver. of Vegas Pro with latest updates.

VP13 B453 also.

Vegaseur and Pluraleyes installed on both ...

Quicktime 7.79.80.95

PC ...

i9 9900K, Intel Graphics 630. Nov 2018.

Mem. 32gb DDR4 Nov. '18.

Graphics card .. Nvidia Rtx 2080 Ti

Nvidia Graphics driver .. latest Studio driver.

Latest Intel Graphics driver

ย 

Laptop ... (Acer Predator G9-793-77AC)

CPU .. i7-6700HQ Skylake-H

Memory ..16GB DDR4ย 

Graphics card .. Nvidia GTX 1070, latest Studio driver.

Komaryt wrote on 8/5/2019, 9:20 AM

"Anyone can explain me what differences are between Vegas 17 Edit and Vegas 17 Pro?"

Vegas Pro comes with a DVD Architect license, Vegas Pro Edit don't.

and that's it ?! wow so after I test trial version I think that edit is good for me because I have Architect with V15.
I can't wait for test that! And if new color grading will as good as davinci's then I will uninstall davinci and there won't be problems with XML exporting from Vegas ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜™

You could export it as LUT. Enjoy VP17!

How could I export project? ;)
Exporting LUT from davinci was not option because I always have projects from multiple cameras which have difference colours and for most clips I need manually change some preferences like brightness/hue/changing colours so it was better to make half project in davinci than in vegas ;) and even that LUT Filter made lut looks different than in DaVinci

zdogg wrote on 8/5/2019, 10:56 AM

What about Vegas Pro 365??? When do we get the upgrade???.....I would have thought that would be instantaneous.

vkmast wrote on 8/5/2019, 11:49 AM

See fr0sty here.

(From the VP 365 product page, a VP 365 FAQ: "How do update installations work? - You will be alerted when an update is available. Updates are not automatic, so you are free to choose when to install the update.")

@zdogg

iggy097 wrote on 8/5/2019, 12:58 PM

Is there a bug report section? NVENC will not render, and you can't even open up Vegas without uninstalling Boris Continuim first.

DesertSweeper wrote on 8/5/2019, 1:25 PM

I have tested Vegas 15 and 16 and 17 on a reference clip with a LUT applied. It is apparent that there is almost no difference in render times between Vegas 15 and 16 across the board with respect to rendering on any combination of my Core i7-8700K and an AMD RX580 or an NVIDIA GTX 1070ti or the built in iGPU

However they have been rather busy it seems, on Vega 17, which is now vastly superior.

So for Vegas v15 and v16 and v17:

For CPU only renders I get 22:16 and 22:40 and 14:57 - a very good improvement

For iGPU renders I get 11:46 and 11:09 and 4:52 (amazing improvement - no add-in GPU!!!). 15 and 16 used only about 20% of my iGPU but now uses 60%

For AMD renders I was not expecting an improvement as the GPU was already maxed out in 15 and 16 at 100% so now I get 4:42 and 4:41 and 4:40 showing the RX580 is indeed a bottleneck (100% across all three). More than likely one would see an improvement on the Vega cards. Will try to get my hands on one.

NVIDIA will be the interesting result as it was yielding 4:17 and 4:23 with only 10 to 20% CPU usage so plenty headroom for improvement there. Unfortunately I returned the borrowed GTX but will get it back tomorrow to see if they have optimised NVENC further for 17 also

Just for the hell of it I ripped a cheap and nasty Quadro P400 out of an NVR and threw it at them to see if there was any improvement using the cheapest of cheap Nvidia's and I get: 13:44 and 14:01 and 9:31

So yes they have worked on NVENC optimisation too...

DesertSweeper wrote on 8/5/2019, 1:34 PM

Is there a bug report section? NVENC will not render, and you can't even open up Vegas without uninstalling Boris Continuim first.

Have no problem rendering NVENC with a Quadro P400 4K-25@24Mbps on Wndows 10

ivan-f wrote on 8/5/2019, 1:36 PM

How export in Prores 4444 ? Thanks

fr0sty wrote on 8/5/2019, 1:57 PM

Look under Magix Intermediate, that is Vegas' flavor of ProRes.

jeremy-stevens wrote on 8/5/2019, 6:40 PM

Would love to see 17 but it fails to launch. does not like the Boris FX and it will not allow 17 to even open. Cant even remove it.

fr0sty wrote on 8/5/2019, 10:17 PM

Go into the Vegas forum (not the news section where we are now), other users have had and solved that issue.

3d87c4 wrote on 8/6/2019, 12:24 AM

So...Windows 7 not supported?

fr0sty wrote on 8/6/2019, 2:06 AM

Windows 10 is required. Sorry, holdouts, but you're gonna have to upgrade.

set wrote on 8/6/2019, 2:14 AM

Would love to see 17 but it fails to launch. does not like the Boris FX and it will not allow 17 to even open. Cant even remove it.

Go to C:\Program Files\Common Files\OFX\Plugins, and move it manually out from that folder..., like maybe C:\Program Files\Common Files\OFX off

alderny wrote on 8/6/2019, 4:54 AM

Is there any way to quickly copy my preferences from version 16 to 17? Or do I have to go through them one at a time?